Mission
LunaNet
In development, run by NASA. Window as our sources word it: No date in our sources.
At a glance
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Operator | NASA |
| Status | In development |
| Window | No date in our sources |
| Address we link | www.nasa.gov |
| Partners named in our sources | None |
| Documents on this site | 1 document |
| Papers on this site | None yet |
| Facts on this page | 4, each with its own source |
Key facts
- NASA states that it will develop a lunar time standard for its own missions and for LunaNet. [1]Official
- A common lunar reference time is one of the requirements of the LunaNet framework of standards, protocols and interface requirements. [2]Official
- Reporting of 25 June 2026 described Coordinated Lunar Time as the basis for NASA's LunaNet. [3]
- The 2024 memorandum requires four features of a celestial time standard: traceability to UTC, accuracy for navigation, resilience to loss of contact, and scalability. [4]Official
In short
LunaNet is a framework rather than a spacecraft: agreed standards, protocols and interface requirements so that lunar communication and navigation services from different agencies work together. NASA states that it will develop a lunar time standard for its own missions and for LunaNet, and a common lunar reference time is one of the framework's requirements. Our registry gives no date for the framework itself, so the window on this page says that rather than naming a year. No such service is running, and no lunar time scale has been realized anywhere.
Every clock value on this site is a model value computed from published rate figures: no lunar time scale has been realized, and nothing on this page is a reading taken from a clock on the Moon[5]. The record itself sits inthe list of missions, its operator has a record of its own in National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and what a microsecond is worth in metres is inwhy microseconds matter.
Each point in the section below rests on a source listed at the foot of this page; where the point is our own arithmetic rather than someone else's document, it says so and the model is set out inhow we calculate lunar time.
Why time matters here
- The framework exists so that missions from different agencies interoperate, and a common lunar reference time is one of the requirements it carries.
- The 2024 memorandum states that a standard defined near the lunar gravitational environment lets assets synchronize with an accuracy that supports precision navigation and science.
- Every lunar clock value we publish is a model value computed from published rates, and the model itself is set out on our methodology page.
Where this record connects
Operator
Documents
Other missions
- Artemis IIIPlanned — 2027
- Artemis IVPlanned — 2028
- MoonlightIn development — No date in our sources
- NovaMoonProposed — No date in our sources
Sources
Last verified